Ethics · 18 Jul 2026

Supreme Court compassionate release policy

With reference to the Supreme Court's July 16, 2026 order on compassionate release of prisoners, consider the following statements:

  1. The order directs States and Union Territories to frame a uniform, time-bound policy for compassionate release within three months.
  2. States are required to define "terminal illness" using the UNODC Handbook on Prisoners with Special Needs.
  3. The order mandates that compassionate release applications be tracked transparently through the e-Prisons portal.
  4. The order arose from a petition filed by the National Human Rights Commission.

How many of the above statements are correct?

AOnly one
BOnly two
COnly three
DAll four

Tests the ability to distinguish between similarly-functioning statutory/constitutional bodies (NALSA vs NHRC) while verifying multiple compound facts drawn from a single order - precision over general recognition.

Subscribe / Login in App →
About this question

Why in news

The Supreme Court directed every State and Union Territory to frame a uniform, time-bound policy for compassionate release of elderly and terminally ill prisoners within three months, acting on a NALSA petition amid India's prisons running at 131% occupancy.

Why for UPSC

This tests whether the candidate can distinguish between similarly-named rights bodies (NALSA vs NHRC) that are frequently confused, while also verifying multiple compound facts about a single Supreme Court order - a common UPSC technique to test precision over general awareness.

Prelims summary

The Supreme Court's 2026 order mandates a uniform, time-bound compassionate release policy for elderly/terminally ill prisoners, defined via the UNODC Handbook and tracked through e-Prisons, following a NALSA petition.

On web, answers are shown once after a test — no save or reattempt. For unlimited reattempts, Hindi medium, and Mentor Observations, use the TAN App.