Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's guidelines on police encounter deaths:
- PUCL v. State of Maharashtra (2014) laid down 16 guidelines requiring independent magisterial inquiry into every police encounter resulting in death.
- The guidelines presume police guilt in every encounter death unless proven otherwise by the investigating officer.
- A Supreme Court-appointed commission later found that the 2019 Hyderabad "Disha case" encounter, despite being publicly celebrated, was staged and not a genuine act of self-defence.
- The guidelines require forensic verification as part of the mandated inquiry process.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Tests the ability to distinguish what a legal safeguard actually requires (neutral verification) from a plausible-sounding misreading (presumption of guilt), while also verifying a specific precedent case outcome.
Subscribe / Login in App →