Why in news
The Delhi High Court refused to stay a trial court's order granting bail to Khurram Parvez and Irfan Mehraj in a 2020 UAPA terror-funding case, despite NIA's national security objections, after Parvez spent four years and eight months in custody without a concluded trial.
Why for UPSC
This "NOT correct" format, used sparingly, tests whether aspirants catch a reversed outcome (stay refused vs stay granted) that is easy to misread quickly, alongside correct case-law recall for two landmark UAPA precedents.
Prelims summary
The Delhi High Court refused to stay bail for Khurram Parvez after nearly five years in custody; Section 43D(5) inverts the bail presumption, but K.A. Najeeb (2021) limits this when trials stall indefinitely, building on Watali (2019)'s restraint on evidence-testing at the bail stage.