With reference to the Delhi High Court's ruling in ANI Media Pvt Ltd vs OpenAI (2026), consider the following statements:
- The Court held that training an AI model on copyrighted content falls under the "fair dealing" exception for research under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act,
- 2. The Court's order is a final judgment, conclusively disposing of ANI's copyright infringement claim against OpenAI.
- The Court found that ChatGPT's outputs were not "substantially similar" to ANI's original articles.
- The ruling drew upon similar 2025 United States court rulings involving Anthropic and Meta.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Tests the ability to distinguish an interim order from a final judgment and to correctly parse the multi-part legal reasoning behind a landmark ruling, rather than recalling only its headline outcome.
Subscribe / Login in App →