Economy · 26 Jul 2026

Section 301 tariffs forced labour India

Consider the following pairs: Country/Entity - Tariff Tier or Action under the 2026 US Section 301 Regime 1. India - Placed in the lower 10 percent tariff tier after a DGFT notification banning forced-labour imports 2. China and Vietnam - Placed in the higher 12.5 percent tariff tier as non-compliant economies 3. DGFT - Inserted a new paragraph into the Foreign Trade Policy banning forced-labour imports through a multilateral WTO ruling 4. US Trade Representative - Determines Section 301 tariff tiers through a unilateral investigation process outside the WTO dispute settlement system How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?

AOnly one pair
BOnly two pairs
COnly three pairs
DAll four pairs

Tests the analytical distinction between a unilateral domestic trade-compliance mechanism and a multilateral WTO process, requiring aspirants to correctly place Section 301's mechanism outside the framework it is often assumed to belong to.

Subscribe / Login in App →
About this question

Why in news

The US finalised permanent Section 301 tariffs on 60 trading partners over forced-labour supply chain practices, placing India in a lower tariff tier than China and Vietnam after a timely DGFT regulatory notification.

Why for UPSC

UPSC often tests whether aspirants correctly understand that unilateral US trade instruments like Section 301 operate independently of the WTO framework - a distinction frequently confused with multilateral trade dispute mechanisms.

Prelims summary

The US's Section 301 tariff regime placed India at a 10% tier (versus 12.5% for China and Vietnam) after a DGFT notification banning forced-labour imports - a unilateral US mechanism operating entirely outside WTO dispute settlement.

On web, answers are shown once after a test — no save or reattempt. For unlimited reattempts, Hindi medium, and Mentor Observations, use the TAN App.