Consider the following Assertion (A) and Reason (R): Assertion (A): Under Indian bail jurisprudence, the continued custody of one accused cannot ordinarily be justified merely because a co-accused in the same case remains absconding. Reason (R): Article 21 of the Constitution guarantees personal liberty and courts have cautioned against detention practices that substitute a fugitive's absence for evidence specific to the individual before them. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above Assertion (A) and Reason (R)?
Tests the ability to recognise causal constitutional reasoning behind a bail principle, distinguishing genuine explanation from two independently true but unconnected statements.
Subscribe / Login in App →