Polity · 8 Aug 2026

Article 341 creamy layer SC ST

Consider the following Assertion (A) and Reason (R): Assertion (A): The Union government has told the Supreme Court that extending the creamy layer principle to SC/ST reservation cannot be ordered by judicial directive and must be enacted through Parliament. Reason (R): Article 341 of the Constitution vests the power to specify or amend the list of Scheduled Castes exclusively in Parliament. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

ABoth A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
BBoth A and R are true but R is NOT the correct explanation of A
CA is true but R is false
DA is false but R is true

Tests the ability to evaluate whether a constitutional provision genuinely functions as the explanatory basis for a government's legal position, not just whether both statements are independently true.

Subscribe / Login in App →
About this question

Why in news

The Union government filed a counter-affidavit in August 2026 opposing petitions seeking court-ordered income-based sub-quotas within SC/ST reservation, despite Justice Gavai's 2024 opinion in State of Punjab vs Davinder Singh urging the government to evolve such a policy.

Why for UPSC

Assertion-Reasoning format tests whether aspirants can identify not just that two facts are true, but whether one genuinely functions as the causal/legal justification for the other - precisely the layer UPSC probes beneath a surface-level "who said what" recall.

Prelims summary

Article 341 gives Parliament exclusive power over the SC list. The Centre invokes this to argue that even after the 2024 Davinder Singh ruling permitted sub-classification, only Parliament - not a court - can mandate a creamy layer policy for SC/ST reservation.

On web, answers are shown once after a test — no save or reattempt. For unlimited reattempts, Hindi medium, and Mentor Observations, use the TAN App.