Governance · 12 Aug 2026

NEET-UG leak chargesheet

Assertion (A): The NEET-UG paper leak, as revealed in the chargesheet, occurred despite the presence of physical entry restrictions on personal items in the confidential examination section.
Reason (R): Compliance with the restriction on carrying personal items relied entirely on self-declaration by subject experts, with no physical frisking to verify it.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

ABoth A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
BBoth A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
CA is true but R is false
DA is false but R is true
This question is based on: The NEET Leak Didn't Need a Genius - It Needed Nobody to Check Pockets
Take this in full test mode → Instructions for 12 Aug 2026
About this question

Why in news

The chargesheet, based on testimony from 18 NTA officials among 360 total witnesses, exposes that the breach happened because basic physical and surveillance safeguards were not actually enforced at the country's most consequential examination.

Why for UPSC

UPSC Assertion-Reasoning questions on governance often test whether a rule's existence is confused with its enforcement; this distinguishes a stated safeguard from its actual verification mechanism.

Prelims summary

The NEET-UG leak occurred despite a formal rule barring personal items in the confidential section, because compliance relied on unverified self-declaration rather than physical frisking - a governance gap between rule and enforcement.

On web, answers are shown once after a test — no save or reattempt. For unlimited reattempts, Hindi medium, and Mentor Observations, use the TAN App.