Summary
The Supreme Court has spent a decade alternately restricting and relaxing firecrackers in Delhi-NCR. It suspended sale licences in 2016, mandated reduced-emission "green crackers" and banned barium and joined crackers in 2018 and on 30 September 2026 permitted specified next-generation joined green crackers while declining a total ban.
The Hindu's editorial of 14 October 2026 argued that green crackers are a hollow fix. Laboratory claims of 45-60 percent lower emissions do not hold in practice, noise is not addressed and enforcement has collapsed. The Commission for Air Quality Management has said certification QR codes were sold to unregistered makers, the explosives regulator PESO has no testing facility in Delhi and police in 2018 and 2019 could not tell green crackers from conventional ones.
This editorial weighs the genuine case for green crackers against that enforcement record. Its conclusion: a pollution rule is only as good as the state's capacity to verify it.
WHY IT MATTERS FOR UPSC & STATE PCS
Ahead of Deepavali 2026, The Hindu argued that the Supreme Court's 30 September order permitting next-generation joined green crackers rests on unverifiable emission claims and failed enforcement. It cited Delhi's post-Deepavali 2025 PM2.5 average of 488 µg/m³, the highest since 2021 and the misuse of certification QR codes.
Standard News
A Rule You Cannot Verify Is a Rule You Cannot Enforce
Every winter, Delhi-NCR faces the same question about firecrackers and the Supreme Court has answered it in different ways. Since 2018, the answer has rested on a compromise: allow only "green crackers", certified to pollute less.
The real tension is no longer whether green crackers are cleaner in a laboratory. It is whether anyone can verify, on a Delhi street in October, that the cracker being burst is green at all.
The case for green crackers The defence of green crackers is stronger than its critics usually admit.
- They remove the worst chemicals. The 2018 ruling in Arjun Gopal v. Union of India banned barium salts, which produce a green flame and cause serious respiratory harm. CSIR-NEERI's approved formulations eliminate them.
- They do emit less. CSIR-NEERI reports that its newer green crackers cut PM10 by 45 to 60 percent. The next-generation joined crackers permitted on 30 September 2026 were redesigned to burst more slowly and produce up to 32 percent less solid waste.
- Livelihoods are real. Sivakasi in Tamil Nadu makes about 80 percent of India's fireworks and employs over 300,000 people. A blanket ban would fall hardest on workers far from Delhi who did not cause its winter smog.
- Crackers are not the main cause. Construction dust, vehicles, stubble burning and still, cold air drive Delhi's winter pollution. Crackers add a sharp spike on top of a problem with other roots. On this view, green crackers are a reasonable middle path between public health and a cultural practice with a livelihood behind it.
The case that enforcement has failed The difficulty is the record of implementation.
After Deepavali 2025, the first since limited green crackers were allowed again, Delhi's average PM2.5 reached 488 µg/m³, the highest since 2021, with an hourly peak of 675. Whatever the per-cracker gain, it did not show up in the air.
The reasons are concrete. The Commission for Air Quality Management has said certification QR codes were sold by registered makers to unregistered ones, so conventional crackers could pass as green. The explosives regulator, PESO, had no testing facility in Delhi.
In 2018 and 2019, police could not tell green crackers from conventional ones. And green crackers do nothing for noise.
Where this leaves us TAN's position is that enforcement capacity, not chemistry, should decide whether green crackers are permitted in Delhi-NCR. The case for green crackers is sound in principle.
Barium removal is a genuine health gain and Sivakasi's workers deserve a legal market. But a pollution rule that relies on a QR code nobody checks and a test no one in Delhi can run, is not a rule; it is a label. Permission in the NCR should depend on verifiable supply: testing within the region, codes checked at licensed points of sale and penalties that actually reach makers who sell certification.
Quick Facts
Key numbers & takeaways — revise these first
-
In November 2016, the Supreme Court suspended firework sale licences in the NCR after Deepavali pushed PM2.5 above 700 µg/m³.
-
In Arjun Gopal v. Union of India (2018), the Court allowed only reduced-emission and green crackers, banned joined crackers and set a two-hour window.
-
On 30 September 2026, the Court permitted specified next-generation joined green crackers and declined a total ban.
-
CSIR-NEERI says its newer green crackers cut PM10 emissions by 45 to 60 percent.
-
After Deepavali 2025, Delhi's 24-hour average PM2.5 reached 488 µg/m³, with an hourly peak of 675 µg/m³.
-
The Commission for Air Quality Management said registered makers sold green-cracker QR codes to unregistered manufacturers.
-
PESO had no testing facility in Delhi; its main testing station is at Gondkhairy, Nagpur.
-
Sivakasi in Tamil Nadu produces about 80 percent of India's fireworks and employs over 300,000 workers.
Connect the dots for your UPSC preparation.
Standard news covers the event. Log in to read our comprehensive analysis and uncover the hidden constitutional, structural, and ethical dimensions of this topic:
The full case for green crackers - barium removal, redesigned laris and Sivakasi's 300,000 jobs - built at its strongest.
A link-by-link account of the enforcement failure, from QR codes sold to unregistered makers to the absence of a PESO testing facility in Delhi.
Why noise pollution sits entirely outside the green-cracker framework, despite statutory noise limits.
TAN's conditional-permission model, which ties the right to sell in the NCR to verified, traceable supply.
Included in this analysis
Join thousands of aspirants analyzing the news deeply.
Unlock Premium — Rs.699 AnnuallyDon't have an account? Sign up for free