Topic 12 of 22
GS Paper 3 Cryptocurrency and Financial Market Regulation Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) - Securities Market Code, 2025 and the Self-Regulatory Organisation (SRO) proposal

12 crore. That is roughly the number of Indians trading virtual digital assets today and not one of them is protected by a market regulator. A Parliamentary panel has just admitted why.

Summary

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance has flagged a "regulatory vacuum" around Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) in its report on the Securities Market Code, 2025. Since the Code defines securities in a technology-neutral way, VDAs fall outside it entirely. The panel wants an interim framework built through Self-Regulatory Organisations (SROs) until a full law is drafted.

WHY IN NEWS FOR UPSC & STATE PCS

The Committee's report matters because it is the first formal parliamentary acknowledgement that India's roughly 12 crore VDA users are taxed and monitored for money laundering, but have no market regulator overseeing governance, disclosure or grievance redressal - a gap the new Securities Market Code does not close.

Standard News

Taxed but Unwatched: What the SRO Proposal Really Admits

A number like 12 crore usually gets treated as a market opportunity in economic writing. Here it should be read as an exposure figure instead. That is roughly how many Indians are trading virtual digital assets right now, according to Chainalysis and every single one of them is currently operating inside a system that taxes their gains but does not govern the platform they trade on.

The Gap the Number Hides

Zoom into what "no market regulator" actually means for one of these 12 crore people. If a stockbroker mismanages your money, SEBI has a grievance redressal mechanism, disclosure norms and the power to penalise. If a VDA exchange mismanages your money - freezes withdrawals, misrepresents its reserves or simply vanishes - there is no equivalent body with jurisdiction.

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires that exchange to verify your identity and report suspicious transactions. The Income-tax Act taxes your gains at a flat 30 percent with no loss offset. Neither of these touches whether the exchange is solvent, honest or fair to you as a customer.

The state has built a fiscal net and an anti-laundering net, but not a protective one.

Why the Securities Market Code Couldn't Just Absorb This The

SMC was drafted to be "technology-neutral"

  • a deliberate design choice meant to future-proof the definition of a security so it doesn't need amending every time a new instrument appears. But VDAs don't satisfy the legal characteristics of securities or derivatives under that definition, so technology-neutral language ends up excluding them rather than including them. The Committee's own words are blunt: this creates a "regulatory grey area," and that grey area translates into "heightened risks of fraud, market manipulation, misrepresentation and inadequate grievance redressal" for the actual people trading inside it.

What the SRO Proposal Is Actually Conceding

The recommendation for an interim Self-Regulatory Organisation, operating under a designated regulator's oversight, is not a minor technical fix - it is Parliament's own committee conceding that five years of taxing and monitoring VDAs without governing them has left millions exposed and that waiting for a full standalone law is no longer defensible.

An SRO would prescribe governance standards, transparency disclosures and grievance redressal even before a comprehensive Act exists - essentially borrowing a model banking and mutual funds have used for decades to self-police an industry while formal legislation catches up.

The tension for Mains aspirants to actually hold onto isn't "should crypto be banned or allowed"

  • that debate is largely settled by the tax regime already treating it as a legitimate, if risky, asset class. The real tension is narrower and sharper: can a state credibly tax and monitor an asset class for a decade while declining to protect the person holding it? The Committee's report is the first time that question has been asked from inside Parliament rather than outside it.

Quick Facts

  • Body: Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance, chaired by Bhartruhari Mahtab. Bill under review: Securities Market Code (SMC), 2025, introduced in the Lok Sabha in December 2025. Users affected: nearly 12 crore Indians in the VDA ecosystem, per Chainalysis data.

    Current regime: 30 percent tax on VDA transfer income, 1 percent TDS and PMLA reporting-entity obligations - but no dedicated market regulator. Proposed interim fix: Self-Regulatory Organisations under a designated regulator's oversight, pending a full legislative framework.

Beyond The Headlines
GS Paper 3 Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) - Securities Market Code, 2025 and the Self-Regulatory Organisation (SRO) proposal

Connect the dots for your UPSC preparation.

Standard news covers the event. Log in to read our comprehensive analysis and uncover the hidden constitutional, structural, and ethical dimensions of this topic:

1

The full mechanism by which "technology-neutral" drafting in the SMC accidentally excluded VDAs and why fixing this needs more than a definitional tweak.

2

How an interim SRO model would actually be structured and enforced under a designated regulator, drawing on precedent from mutual funds and stock exchanges.

3

The specific way-forward roadmap distinguishing short-term investor safeguards from the long-term standalone VDA law the Committee wants.

4

A named case study connecting India's regulatory vacuum to a real global exchange collapse and the lesson it holds for UPSC's GS3 economy and internal security overlap.

Included in this analysis

Deep Analysis Sharpens your Mains-level understanding.
8 Languages Read the news comfortably in your language.
PYQ Connection Direct connection with previous year Mains questions.
Expected Questions Possible upcoming questions for Prelims & Mains.
Daily Evaluation Daily Prelims test, plus category-wise Mains evaluation.
Mentor Observation Daily, topic-wise expert feedback on your tests.
Value Additions Important Case Studies and daily Vocab Word.

Join thousands of aspirants analyzing the news deeply.

Log In to Read Full Article

More from 25 Jul 2026

Short titles by category — open any story to read it fully.

GS Paper 2
International Relations - nuclear non-proliferation and West Asia diplomacy Picture Donald Trump, hours after his own administration signs a civil nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia, opening Truth Social to insist "there will be no enrichment of material" - while the deal his own government just announced does exactly that. India's twin-track diplomacy at ASEAN Regional Forum and East Asia Summit - maritime security capacity-sharing and counter-Pakistan diplomatic firewall Picture two rooms in the same Manila hotel, an hour apart. In one, India is handing ASEAN navies live data on suspicious ships in their own waters, no strings attached. In the other, an Indian spokesperson is publicly shredding Pakistan's attempt to drag Kashmir into a forum built for the South China Sea. Same trip, same minister, two entirely different kinds of power on display. Compounding disruption of the Strait of Hormuz and Bab-el-Mandeb chokepoints and the direct read-through to India's crude import bill What happens to your country's fuel bill when the backup plan for a blocked oil route gets blocked too? That is not a hypothetical this week - it is exactly what happened when the Houthis struck Saudi tankers in the Red Sea, the very route Riyadh built to avoid the Strait of Hormuz in the first place. Article 19(1)(b) limits, BNSS Section 163's succession from CrPC 144 and whether "least invasiveness" functions as an enforceable standard A protester at Jantar Mantar and the officer facing them are both, technically, standing on the same constitutional ground - one exercising Article 19(1)(b), the other enforcing a "reasonable restriction" under 19(3). So why does only one of them find out where that line actually was and only after the tear gas has already been fired? Micro-geofenced internet suspension under the Telecommunications (Temporary Suspension of Services) Rules, 2024 and the absence of prior judicial sign-off 1.5 kilometres was the radius on paper. Two kilometres away, at Mandi House, shopkeepers were already telling customers cash only, because UPI had gone dark along with everyone else's data. The map the government drew and the map the shutdown actually followed were never the same map. Article 14, Fast-Track Courts and the Limits of Judicial Speed A rape survivor's case gets assigned to a "fast-track" court and her family assumes the word means what it says. Two years later she is still waiting for a verdict, because the court fast-tracking her case has the same missing judges, the same missing forensic lab and the same overflowing docket as the one next door.