Environment · 21 Jul 2026

Pallikaranai marsh Ramsar zone of influence

With reference to Chennai's Pallikaranai marsh, which one of the following correctly describes the current regulatory position?

AThe marsh's Reserve Forest core of 698 hectares was notified in 2007 and the NGT's one-kilometre construction freeze, imposed in September 2025, is a scientifically finalised "zone of influence" boundary under the Wetlands Rules, 2017.
BThe marsh's Reserve Forest core of 698 hectares was notified in 2007 and the NGT's one-kilometre construction freeze, imposed in September 2025, is an interim, non-scientific measure pending a "zone of influence" study.
CThe marsh gained Ramsar recognition in 2007 and its protected area including buffer stands at 698 hectares.
DThe marsh's core area was reduced from 50 sq km to 698 hectares entirely due to construction that occurred after its 2022 Ramsar recognition.

Tests the ability to distinguish an interim precautionary administrative measure from a scientifically finalised regulatory boundary, a nuanced distinction central to environmental governance questions.

Subscribe / Login in App →
About this question

Why in news

An NGT-ordered one-kilometre construction freeze around the Ramsar-listed Pallikaranai marsh has entered its second year without the scientific boundary study it was meant to precede, stalling redevelopment for thousands of residents.

Why for UPSC

UPSC often tests whether an aspirant can distinguish an interim administrative measure from a finalised scientific/legal boundary - a distinction with real consequences for how a provision should be read.

Prelims summary

Pallikaranai's 698-hectare core was notified in 2007; Ramsar status came in 2022. The NGT's one-kilometre buffer (September 2025) is explicitly an interim, non-scientific placeholder, not the finalised "zone of influence."

On web, answers are shown once after a test — no save or reattempt. For unlimited reattempts, Hindi medium, and Mentor Observations, use the TAN App.